<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Using Lots of</title> <atom:link href="http://www.english-at-home.com/grammar/using-lots-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.english-at-home.com</link> <description>Learn English for free</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 07:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Clare</title><link>http://www.english-at-home.com/grammar/using-lots-of/#comment-56714</link> <dc:creator>Clare</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:59:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://english-at-home.com/beta-wp/grammar/using-lots-of/#comment-56714</guid> <description>We can use a lot of and lots of for plural countable, and uncountable nouns.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can use a lot of and lots of for plural countable, and uncountable nouns.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: juna</title><link>http://www.english-at-home.com/grammar/using-lots-of/#comment-56709</link> <dc:creator>juna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:37:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://english-at-home.com/beta-wp/grammar/using-lots-of/#comment-56709</guid> <description>Thanks for clearing my wrong conception about &#039;lot of&#039; and &#039;lots of&#039;. I used to think we use a lot of for singular no and lots of for plural like a lot of accident and lots of accidents. The fact is both we can use for plural countable noun only. Am I correct.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clearing my wrong conception about &#039;lot of&#039; and &#039;lots of&#039;. I used to think we use a lot of for singular no and lots of for plural like a lot of accident and lots of accidents. The fact is both we can use for plural countable noun only. Am I correct.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Clare</title><link>http://www.english-at-home.com/grammar/using-lots-of/#comment-47287</link> <dc:creator>Clare</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 07:56:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://english-at-home.com/beta-wp/grammar/using-lots-of/#comment-47287</guid> <description>Either the first one, or &quot;There&#039;s lots of candy to buy&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either the first one, or &#034;There&#039;s lots of candy to buy&#034;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: naruto</title><link>http://www.english-at-home.com/grammar/using-lots-of/#comment-47252</link> <dc:creator>naruto</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:43:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://english-at-home.com/beta-wp/grammar/using-lots-of/#comment-47252</guid> <description>Could it be Whole lots of activities are planned?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be Whole lots of activities are planned?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: naruto</title><link>http://www.english-at-home.com/grammar/using-lots-of/#comment-47251</link> <dc:creator>naruto</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:40:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://english-at-home.com/beta-wp/grammar/using-lots-of/#comment-47251</guid> <description>what is correct? There are lots of candies to buy, or There are lots of candy to buy?thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is correct? There are lots of candies to buy, or There are lots of candy to buy?thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 28/32 queries in 0.104 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 218/218 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.english-at-home.com @ 2012-02-07 12:58:37 -->
